Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin | Benefits, Features, and Decisions

Introduction

As a dedicated runner, I’ve tested the Brooks Ghost and Brooks Glycerin over the past year.

These are flagship shoes from Brooks, which is known for making high-quality running shoes.

Although these shoes share similarities, but the models serve different needs and preferences. 

That’s why I’m going to help you choose from the Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin by comparing these two shoes based on comfort, performance, materials, etc.

Table of Contents

• Introduction
• Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin
• About Brooks Ghost
• About Brooks Glycerin
• What are Brooks Ghost made for?
• Are Brooks Ghost good for distance?
• What Is The Difference Between Brooks Ghost And Glycerine: Head To Head Comparison
• How To Choose From These Shoes
• Brooks Ghost 14 vs. Brooks Glycerin 19
• Conclusion
• FAQ:

Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin

I’ve spent countless miles in both the Brooks Ghost and the Glycerin. These two models are among Brooks’ most popular offerings, each with unique features and benefits. 

The Brooks Ghost is renowned for its value-for-money proposition. Despite being $20 cheaper than Glycerin, it keeps quality and comfort high. These shoes’ upper is soft and luxurious, placing them at the top of their class. It’s also firmer than the Glycerin, which results in a more responsive ride, particularly noticeable in the Ghost 14 model.

Compared to Ghost, Brooks Glycerin is slightly heavier due to its improved comfort. This shoe’s extra padding gives you the sensation of running on clouds due to its snug, softer fit. However, this does not necessarily make the Glycerin a better trainer. 

Both models feature Brooks’ signature DNA Loft midsole, providing exceptional underfoot comfort and shock absorption.

Here’s a short comparison table between Ghost vs Glycerin:

About Brooks Ghost

The Brooks Ghost series is popular among runners for its exceptional comfort, durability, and performance.

From my experience, I suggest you invest in Ghost 14 because it offers better durability and more responsive cushioning. Now, Let’s see what features and technologies Ghost shoes have.

Key features and technologies:

1. Midsole Cushioning and Responsiveness: DNA Loft and BioMoGo foam are used in the Ghost series. DNA Loft is Brooks’s softest foam, while BioMoGo is more responsive. This combination provides unmatched responsive design and robust stability.
2. Upper Design and Materials: A unique mesh material combines structure and flexibility in the Ghost’s upper. This ensures your foot feels supported but not constricted. Some models also incorporate Air Mesh technology to keep the toe box cool.
3. Outsole Durability and Traction: The Ghost series is known for its durable outsole that withstands high-mileage runs. The shoes suit most runs, from daily training to long-distance marathons.

Target Audience and Recommended Use: 

Brooks Ghost is a versatile shoe that caters to a wide range of runners. It is an excellent choice for runners who need a comfortable, supportive shoe that can handle various conditions and distances.

Pros and Cons of Brooks Ghost: 

Pros: The Ghost offers responsive cushioning, a comfortable, stretchable upper, and a durable outsole. It’s a do-a-little-bit-of-everything trainer that has taken care of many runners. 

Cons: Despite its many advantages, some users would love to see Brooks make the Ghost series more lively and fun.

About Brooks Glycerin

As I have tested Glycerin, I can vouch for its reputation as a premium comfort shoe. Brooks’ Glycerin series offers runners the best cushioning experience. It’s like running on clouds, with every step more comfortable than the last.

Key features and technologies:

• Enhanced cushioning and comfort: These shoes are all about plushness, featuring the highest level of Brooks’ DNA Loft cushioning. This makes it incredibly soft and comfortable, perfect for long runs or recovery days when your feet need extra pampering. The underfoot feel is luxurious, absorbing shock effectively and providing excellent energy return despite the high level of cushioning.
• Upper construction and fit: The upper of the Glycerin is designed with a 3D Fit Print mesh, which enhances the shoe’s structure and fit while maintaining breathability. You’ll just love how snug, glove-like the shoe fits around your foot thanks to its plush interior lining. From my experience, this translates into a secure yet flexible fit, accommodating a wide range of foot shapes and sizes.
• Outsole performance and flexibility: Despite its focus on comfort, the Glycerin doesn’t compromise on performance. The outsole is designed with a blown rubber material that offers durability and traction. The flexibility is decent, allowing a natural foot movement, which I found beneficial during longer runs.
• Target audience and recommended use: This shoe is ideal for road runners prioritizing comfort and cushioning, especially those tackling longer distances. This shoe is also good for heavier runners requiring extra underfoot padding. From my experience, the Glycerin is also well-suited for recovery days when your legs need some extra love.

Pros:

• Exceptional cushioning for a luxurious ride
• A flexible and breathable upper that adapts to your foot
• Durable and reliable for long-distance running

Cons:

• Slightly heavier due to the enhanced cushioning
• It may not be suitable for runners seeking a firmer, more responsive ride

What are Brooks Ghost made for?

Brooks Ghost shoes are made for both casual and serious runners seeking a balance of comfort, durability, and responsiveness. They are versatile enough to handle different running conditions and styles.

Are Brooks Ghost good for distance?

Yes, Brooks Ghost shoes are suitable for distance running. They provide reliable cushioning and support, which can help maintain comfort over long distances.

What Is The Difference Between Brooks Ghost And Glycerine: Head To Head Comparison

Although Ghost and Glycerin are both good running shoes, choosing between them may be difficult. These two running shoes have a lot in common, such as good support, cushioning, durable outsoles, and competitive pricing. But you easily choose from Brooks Glycerin vs Ghost by reading the head-to-head comparison below.

Cushioning and Support: The Brooks Ghost series is known for its balanced cushioning, providing a smooth, easy ride. The shoe’s midsole features 100% DNA Loft foam, similar to the Glycerin, offering a plush yet responsive cushioning.

Meanwhile, Glycerin has more cushioning than the Ghost, making it heavier and providing a more luxurious, soft feel. Glycerin may be the better choice if you’re looking for maximum softness and comfort.

Support Features in Both Shoes: Ghost and Glycerin are neutral shoes, meaning they’re made for runners who don’t overpronate. They offer moderate support, with the Ghost providing a more traditional last shaping and flexible forefoot.

Comfort: The Ghost is highly praised for its comfort. You’ll find generous padding in the tongue, heel tab, and collar, which pillows your feet. Plus, it offers a stabilizing outsole geometry that supports each landing and take-off with plush padding.

Conversely, Glycerin is known for its exceptional cushioning that provides a plush, cloud-like running experience.

Fit: These shoes have a comfortable fit, with the Ghost being slightly wider, accommodating a variety of foot shapes and sizes.

Performance and Responsiveness: Despite its plush cushioning, the Ghost doesn’t compromise on responsiveness. The BioMoGo foam in the midsole adds a nice bounce to your step, making the Ghost suitable for short runs and long-distance marathons.

With its extra cushioning, the Glycerin might feel less responsive than the Ghost. However, it can still deliver a satisfactory performance, especially on long runs where comfort is paramount.

Durability and Traction: The Ghost is known for its durable outsole that can withstand high-mileage runs. Its reliable traction also makes it suitable for a variety of terrains.

Glycerin also boasts a durable outsole, though it might wear out a little faster than the Ghost due to its softer cushioning.

Traction Capabilities in Both Models:

Ghost and Glycerin have excellent traction, so you can confidently run on dry and wet surfaces.

User Reviews and Feedback: As per my research on reviews and feedback, the Brooks Ghost and the Brooks Glycerin have a solid fan base. Users of the Brooks Ghost often praise its balance between comfort and responsiveness. 

They appreciate the shoe’s versatility, noting that it performs well during short, quick, and longer, slower runs. Cushioning is often described as just right – not too soft or hard. Users also mention the shoe’s durability, saying it holds well even after extensive use.

However, some users note that this additional cushioning makes the shoe slightly heavier than others, which may be better for those seeking a lightweight design. As a result of Glycerin’s cushioning, runners often go longer.

How To Choose From These Shoes

Before buying comfortable Brooks shoes, you need to consider several things, such as foot type, size, comfort, etc. 

Let’s see in detail what you must consider before choosing between Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin for walking.

Foot Type and Pronation Considerations:

It is important to consider your foot type and pronation when choosing between Brooks Ghost vs Brooks Glycerin. As your foot lands, it rolls inward for impact distribution. You can find comfortable running shoes by understanding your pronation type.

Running Gait Analysis and Its Impact on Shoe Selection:

Running gait analysis can be an essential tool in helping you choose the right running shoe. 

This process involves assessing how you run and identifying any characteristics that may affect your choice of running shoe.

The Glycerin may be a better shoe depending on how you land (pronation or supination). However, you may find the Ghost appropriate if you have a neutral gait.

Personal Preferences and Running Goals:

Your personal preferences and running goals also play a significant role in choosing the right shoe.

Glycerin is good for long-distance runs like marathons, while Ghost works for daily activities.

Trying On And Testing The Shoes:

Finally, trying on and testing the shoes is the most reliable way to know which is right for you. Try running shoes in the afternoon or after a long run, as your feet will have expanded to their maximum size. Also, remember to wear your usual running socks and bring any orthotics or inserts you usually use.

Brooks Ghost 14 vs. Brooks Glycerin 19

Until now, we did not compare specific models of Brooks shoes. So, let’s compare the Ghost 14 and the Glycerin 19, which are among the most notable Brooks shoes.

Comfort: Both the Ghost 14 and Glycerin 19 are renowned for their comfort. The Ghost 14 offers a responsive cushioning that enhances energy return, significantly improving over its predecessor. 

On the other hand, the Glycerin 19 provides a plush liner for a softer, snugger fit, making it an ideal choice for runners seeking more cushioning.

Weight: The Glycerin 19 is slightly heavier than the Ghost 14, with the additional weight attributed to its extra cushioning. However, both shoes are designed to provide a lightweight feel for runners.

Size: Both the Ghost 14 and the Glycerin 19 offer a wide range of sizes to accommodate various foot shapes and sizes. They are true to size, ensuring a comfortable and secure fit for runners.

Price: Regarding prices, the Ghost 14 is less expensive than the Glycerin 19. Despite its lower price, the Ghost 14 still offers a soft, luxurious upper, making it a great value for money.

Material: Both shoes feature high-quality materials contributing to their comfort and durability. The Ghost 14 has a newly engineered mesh upper that enhances breathability, while the Glycerin 19 features a plush interior liner for added comfort.

Arch Support: Starting with the Brooks Ghost 14, reviewers have highlighted its impressive arch support. You will notice the arch support when you put the shoes on. The insoles cradle your arches. It provides consistent support and relieves pressure on your tendons. Moreover, Ghost 14’s midfoot arch provides lateral stability. Also, the shoe’s toe box is said to be generous, further enhancing comfort.

Brooks Glycerin 19 is a neutral, road-running shoe designed primarily for runners with high arches who do not overpronate. It’s appreciated for its comfort and support, benefiting some users with mild plantar fasciitis. This shoe is ideal for running because of its DNA LOFT cushioning and 10mm heel-to-toe offset. Even without arch support, it can accommodate an arch support insert without slipping.

Conclusion

After carefully comparing the Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin, it’s clear that each has its unique strengths.

Brooks Ghost is more affordable and offers a soft, luxurious upper, making it stand out. 

However, its firmness compared to the Glycerin might be a consideration depending on your preference for cushioning.

Glycerin provides a snugger fit and enhanced cushioning, making it slightly heavier than the Ghost. This extra cushioning can make it an excellent choice for those seeking maximum comfort during their runs.

Regarding responsiveness, the Ghost 14’s cushioning outperforms the Glycerin 19. Ghost 14 offers improved energy return. Also, Ghost provides a wider and more stable ride, whereas the Glycerin has a plush feel.

FAQ: